dhampyresa: Paris coat of arms: Gules, on waves of the sea in base a ship in full sail Argent, a chief Azure semé-de-lys Or (fluctuat nec mergitur)
I only read three non-fiction books in French during 2025, two prescriptive and one descriptive.

The descriptive was Bleu: histoire d'une couleur, (Blue: history of a colour) by Michel Pastoureau. This was super fascinating! It uses the colour blue specifically to examine the social/cultural place of colours throughout history in Europe (and France specifically). I spoke about it here. Pastoureau is a historian focusing on symbolism and has written books on other colours, various animals, striped clothing, etc. I'm planning on reading more of his work.

The prescriptive works were Agir et penser comme un chat, (Act and think like a cat) by Stéphane Garnier and Et maintenant, on mange quoi?, (Now what do we eat?) by Christophe Brusset.

I did not get from the cat book what I wanted which was the answer to the question "is this a parody or not?". It's basic, boilerplate self-help advice -- be yourself, enjoy the present, be confident, etc -- dressed up in "be more like a cat".

Et maintenant, on mange quoi? is a follow-up to a previous book by the author -- that I haven't read -- about the ways the food industry cuts corners at the expense of the consumers and their health. This book is about how to avoid these cut corners and eat better. It was interesting, but I don't think I got any practical advice I wasn't already using, ie buy ingredients rather than pre-prepared foods, local is preferable to not and check ingredient lists. It brought up that most berry jams are made of elderberries because they are mild tasting, highly colouring and cheaper than other berries. This is irrelevant to me because I get all my jams from my dad, made from blackberries we pick ourselves. Still interesting to know.
dhampyresa: Paris coat of arms: Gules, on waves of the sea in base a ship in full sail Argent, a chief Azure semé-de-lys Or (fluctuat nec mergitur)
I'm working on writing up my best books of 2024 entry but I got carried away talking about Bleu: histoire d'une couleur (Blue: history of a colour) by Michel Pastoureau, so I'm moving it to its own entry.

Pastoureau is a historian focusing on symbolism so this was super fascinating! It uses the colour blue specifically to examine the social/cultural place of colours throughout history in Europe, mostly France, but there is at least one transatlantic trip to talk about blue jeans.

Blue is picked because it's a relatively "new" colour as a standalone rather than a type of black, green or purple. Many languages don't have a blue/green distinction, for example -- I wrote about how this shows up in Brezhoneg/Breton here. The comments have discussion about other languages.

The history of colours is particularly hard to study, because textiles decay, dyes and paints change colours over time and languages evolve both through time and place. All this without mentioning that the quality and colour of the light itself affects how a colour appears: the same object might look very different under candle light and sunlight.

The main take away of the book is we live in a society that colours are not physical phenomenon, but social ones. Yes, there is the physical reality of what one person's eyes perceive, but how they interpret and communicate that reality is completely context dependant.

I will now proceed to list a bunch of facts I learned reading this book:

- In the Middle Ages, there was a debate on the metaphysical nature of colour: is it a property of the object itself and thus matter and thus sinful or is it a property of light and thus divine? The Catholic church went with "divine", in the end. Interestingly, centuries later, the Reformation went with "sinful" -- though I don't know that the earlier debate was explicitly referenced rather than a wholesale rejection of Catholicism's whole deal.

- The liturgical colours of the Catholic do not include blue. I was shocked to read this because I had never thought of it and the colour blue is so strongly tied to Mary, but it is true. The reason blue is tied to Mary is that it was extremely expensive and God's mom deserves the best.

- Goethe should turn on his location. I just want to talk. (He disapproves of blue walls. I have a blue wall in my bedroom.)

- The word "indigo" comes from the fact bricks of dried extract from the indigo plant were used in Europe as dyes -- and thought to be rocks from India.

- In the Middle Ages, pale blue was closer to pink than dark blue. Colours were grouped by saturation, not hue.

- In the Renaissance, blue was a warm colour. (The book has dates throughout, as much as possible. I'm not very good at remembering them.)

- Red dyers and blue dyers were different jobs and never shall the twain meet. There was a practical consideration for this: one needs hot water to work, the other cold. There was also a cultural aspect to this division as northern France focused on red dyes and southern on blue.

- Which lead to a trend in the late 13th century in northern France churches where the devil was depicted in blue, such as this stained glass window:

A stained glass window of Job and the Devil, the Devil has blue skin

A post!

Oct. 14th, 2024 12:05 am
dhampyresa: (Default)
I'm not dead! Mostly not posting because I feel I don't have anything to say or can't figure out how to say it then I feel bad for not posting and shy away from DW. So, in the interest of breaking that streak, let me post about something that came up in conversation yesterday and has a couple times in the past.

Alice Coffin's Le Génie lesbien[1] was the first time I came across the concept of vertical vs horizontal marginalisations. I cannot remember much else about the book, much less if she said she got the idea from somewhere or not, but this stuck with me as a useful concept, so allow me to relay it as I understand it.

[1] The title could be translated as either "Lesbian genius" or, given the emphasis on movement building and organising, "Lesbian engineering".

A "vertical" marginalisation is when the marginalised person is when (most) people of that marginalisation are from similarly marginalised families/communities. For example, most Black people grow up in Black families. Obviously there are exceptions -- most Muslims are from Muslim families, but converts are not -- but it holds true for most members of that community. It's "vertical" because you get it from your parents who get it from theirs and so on, going "up" your family tree.

By contrast, a "horizontal" marginalisation is one whose members are not part of a community by "default". The book uses the example of most queer people not being from queer families. The horizontality is from having to seek out the community in the present. This difference from your family of origin can function as a double penalty: on top of being alien to society at large (if not oppressed), you are also alien inside your home (if not oppressed). This can impact your ability to know who you are and be your authentic self -- which is itself a form of trauma.

Obviously this is a very broad generalisation and there are many individual cases that don't fit either category, but it highlights a difference I had never considered before and is an interesting way to look at things.


I think I might do more posts about bits and bobs and I learn(ed) from the non-fiction I read, if anyone's interested. I should warn my reading taste is very eclectic, though.

Profile

dhampyresa: (Default)
dhampyresa

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 15 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags